Comments on: Mossberg’s 464 SPX Tactical Lever Action.

By: Micah

Micah — Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:07:55 +0000

I’m not that crazy about the adjustable stock as far as looks go – but comfort is more important to me than looks anyway.

My only real complaints are that I wish they had gone with a side ejecting design instead of a top ejecting one. A picatinny rail on top of the receiver seems like a must for a rifle like this.
The other complaint is I wish they had chambered one in a pistol caliber. Personally I’d prefer a .357 mag version, but I could easily see it in a .44 mag or even .454 Casull

By: marco

marco — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 07:16:00 +0000

that guns really ugly! anyway why would ya go tacticool with a gun design
thats 117 years old & its ammo design(30-30)thats 116 years old &
.22LR = 124 years old….. heres a brain storm why not a redesign
hammerless in .204 angle eject with a top mounted Picatinny ??????????

yeah .204 and how about a .50 Beowulf for the big one

By: ScottW

ScottW — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:40:51 +0000

Hmmm I see where they are going with this but it looks a bit uglier than it should.

Why no top rail? You’d think a top rail would be the first rail you’d add to a rifle.

Apparently there’s a ZMB (Zombie) model in the works. That will upset some